IoT Solution for Chiller Condition Monitoring
1. Executive Summary Parameter Before Dec 23 After June 24 Change Avg. SPC (KW/TR) 0.775 0.665 ↓14.3% Avg. Power (KW) 162.83 139.56 ↓14.3% Cooling Capacity (TR) 180.51 217.28 ↑20.4% Avg. COP 4.0 5.5 ↑37.5% Note: 2. The Challenge Challenge: Key Pain Points: Solution: Deployment of custom Ficus IoT data acquisition devices, seamlessly integrated with existing PLCs, to enable real-time condition monitoring. Data was visualized through the Crowsensor dashboard, providing actionable insights for operators and management. Outcome: 3. The Solution IoT-Based Chiller Condition Monitoring Chiller performance monitoring was achieved by capturing and analyzing key operational parameters, such as: These derived metrics were calculated from raw data sourced from: Sample Data Points Acquired Below table shows some of the parameters out of several data points being acquired. Parameter Details Water Inlet Temperature Unit: °F Condenser Inlet Water Temperature Unit: °F Refrigerant Level Unit: % Inlet Guide Vane Unit: % Suction Pressure Unit: PSI Cavity Temperature Unit: °F Loading Status Unit: % Compressor Run Hour Unit: Hr Evaporator Approach Unit: °F Power Unit: kW Compressor Inverter Temperature Unit: °F Solution Architecture Image 1: Above image shows the solution architecture Ficus IoT devices interfaced directly with the chiller PLCs and ancillary sensors, transmitting data to an on-premise server for secure processing and storage. The Crowsensor dashboard provided intuitive, real-time visualization and analytics. Technical Highlights Image 2: Above image shows the Chiller PLC panel Image 3: Above image shows the Ficus Device Installed on the Chiller Panel Data Visualization Image 4: Above image shows the dashboard screenshot Image 5: Above image shows the dashboard screenshot 3. Results & Measurable Impact Post-Intervention: SPC stabilized below 0.70 KW/TR Figure 1: Monthly SPC trend with inefficiency threshold (0.75 KW/TR) Figure 2: Power consumption versus cooling capacity trend Key Outcomes: Figure 3: Monthly COP and EER trends with minimum threshold Potential Cost Savings Annual Savings = ∆Power × Hours × Rate = (162.83 − 139.56) × 8,760 × 10 = Rs. 2,037,492 Note: Actual cost saving may vary depending upon conditions on ground. 4. Why This Matters for Other Manufacturers Conclusion:By leveraging Sisai IoT technology for real-time chiller monitoring and analytics, the customer transformed their maintenance strategy from reactive to predictive, significantly reducing costs and improving operational resilience. This case demonstrates the tangible benefits of IoT-driven optimization for large-scale manufacturing environments Contact us for discussions +91 9284255899 Contact@sisaitechnologies.com